Thompson said the review stems from this “potential missed step.”
Deloitte alleges that UW-Madison allowed two competitors, Huron and Accenture, to participate in developing part of the bid and then bid on the project – a process the company has decried as “flawed.” lack of transparency, unequal treatment and conflicts of interest which cannot be tolerated in public procurement.
UW-Madison evaluated the companies through what is known as a request for proposals. The university evaluated vendors based on the quality of their proposal and their past experience, not just the dollar amount they were offering.
Huron and Accenture were respectively awarded contracts of $ 808,000 and $ 819,000 to work on the first phase of the UW-Madison project, according to System.
In a letter to Deloitte on Monday, UW-Madison purchasing director Lori Voss said the request for proposals was canceled on February 18 – five days before the company raised concerns in its letter. February 23. She said the university will not solicit new offers until the exam is over.
“An audit will determine all the facts, but this process issue would not have had a significant impact on the awards granted to two of the five suppliers who submitted bids through this open public process,” said the spokesperson for university, John Lucas.
The System’s Internal Audit Office is conducting the review. The office reports to Thompson and the UW board of directors, but has independent authority.